Showing posts with label Texas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Texas. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Just Going to Leave These Right Here...



EDIT (2/24/14) - this WaPo piece says so much better what I try to say below. Definitely check out that LBJ ad for the lulz.

Elections are coming up, so I tried to spend some time today getting educated about my choices. I have to admit, it wouldn't have registered that early voting starts tomorrow (for the March 4 primary election, eek!) except that during my Olympics viewing last night I saw this ad at every commercial break:


Pretty sure I saw it 15 million times.

Then, on the way to school this morning, I saw Elisa Chan's road sign:


Chan is the City Council person for my district here in San Antonio. I was happy to vote for her. What's not to love? She's a strong female, an engineer who owns her own business, someone who ran on fighting government bureaucracy and reforms in education. Then this happened.

Whatever. What caught me about her sign was the word "conservative." It seems that this word is on every Republican candidate's signage materials or somewhere on their website, regardless of the office he's running for.* And get this, in the Texas US Senate race, alone (and I know it's the primary and so the candidates will be whittled down, but still...) THERE ARE EIGHT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES RUNNING AGAINST EACH OTHER, y'all! And seven are male.

Most importantly, though, THEY ARE CONSERVATIVE.

The conservative who will impeach Obama

The God-fearing conservative
The Perry endorsed conservative 

And for old time's sake since he's retiring this year, here's a Rick Perry favorite:


And here's our lone female Republican US Senate candidate, also conservative:

The nation building conservative
And here are some of the Republicans running for Attorney General:

The proven conservative (also has courage)

The unwavering conservative
The fighting for Texas, getting results conservative

And here are the guys running for Lt. Governor (all the Republican candidates are male and Anglo. There's one female running. She's Hispanic and a Democrat, Leticia Van De Putte). This position is, arguably, the most powerful post in Texas government because its occupant is President of the Texas Senate and controls the budgeting process as leader of the Legislative Budget Board.

The incumbent conservative

The judge bashing conservative
As an aside (because she is a Democrat), here's Van de Putte's platform, it's the only one - of any of the candidates - that prioritizes "empowering women":

Her priorities

And then there's the race for Governor:

The "conservative to the core"
Abbott faces three interesting people in the Republican primary:

The a-typical conservative 
and

The candidate who didn't get the "conservative" memo
and who supports legalization of marijuana so she doesn't stand a chance in hell
and Larry Kilgore, who legally changed his middle name to "SECEDE" and now goes by Secede Kilgore.

The rest I'm going to post willy nilly because I'm tired:

The conservative with top Republican issues
The obvious conservative
The 3-Cs conservative

The conservative champion

The Obamanite fighting conservative 
The anatomical plumbing conservative.
Hegar the conservative.
Hilderbran the credentialed conservative

Malachi the conservative leader
The conservative with priorities
The TEXAS conservative
The "I'm so conservative Ted Nugent endorses me"
The Conservative with 10 Conservative Values
And another conservative leader, I'm sure there are more...
There are sooooo many more candidates that I just didn't want to couldn't get to. Click the link below for a very comprehensive directory of Texas candidates in this election cycle. Or if you're just jonesing for a conservative ideology fix.

On that note...what more can I say?













***
* I just did a quick Google search, landed here, and started clicking links. Most are men. Anglo. And conservative. My head hurts now.

Saturday, April 16, 2011

Drove my Chevy to the Levy [sic]...



I can’t remember if I cried
When I read about his widowed bride,
But something touched me deep inside
The day the music died.

So bye-bye, Miss American pie.
Drove my chevy to the levee,
But the levee was dry.
And them good old boys were drinkin’ whiskey and rye
Singin’, "this’ll be the day that I die.
"this’ll be the day that I die."
                                                  -- Don McLean, "American Pie"
 
It was after two CST. I'd just doubled up in a 6-max ring game on Stars (really, I did). Having done that, it was time to protect the BR and move on. I searched the lobby, found a juicy game, and clicked to sit down.


I thought it was a glitch. But after a couple more attempts, I went straight to Twitter. And that's when I finally began getting the picture. Others have outlined in better detail what's happened (see cliffs here via @Scarlet_LV and more here and here), but no one really knows yet what it means.

As I was contemplating life without on-line poker, I got really irritated. I live in Texas...the birthplace of Texas Hold 'em (I don't know if this is factual, but I'm going with it - Doyle's from Texas and he's the Godfather of Poker, so that's good enough for me)...and after today I now have to catch a plane or drive several hours to play (unless I'm willing to risk the home games). That makes absolutely no sense given that Texas is the second-largest U.S. state by both area and population, and the largest state in the Union.

I am not a gaming attorney and I do not know the UIGEA like the back of my hand, so there is nothing black letter law legal or authoritative about what I'm about to say. All I know is that after all this went down, all I could think about is liberty and the right of privacy and what the laws regarding gambling are in my state. I cannot speak to the legal issue of how the internet and social media impacts and colors the constitutionally protected right of privacy, but what I could do was a little research.

A few years ago in Texas, a big case made news. At issue was "whether petitioners were free as adults to engage in private conduct in the exercise of their liberty under the Due Process Clause" (paraphrased, whether a Texas statute making it illegal for two men to get it on in the privacy of their own home was constitutional).

Ultimately, the Court protected the right of people to be able to "engage in private conduct without government intervention," finding that the Texas statute at issue did nothing to further any "legitimate state interest which can justify its intrusion into the individual’s personal and private life." Fortunately, the Supremes  got this one right in Lawrence v. Texas.

I like that case for a lot of different reasons, but mainly because I like to think that what we do in the privacy of our own homes is protected (yes, I am assuming for the sake of argument that people are good and decent and not abusing their kids, building meth labs, etc etc).

And that lead me, immediately (obviously...Lawrence  was all about sex, people), to thinking about how I could legally sit in front of my computer, whip out my credit card, transfer some money via the airwaves, and download a bunch of pron, even if I were underage. But I can't do the same to play poker, a game of skill. I compare the two not really for legal argument but because people often think of pornography and "gambling" as vices.

Here's what the Texas Penal Code says about gambling:

Sec. 47.02.  GAMBLING. 
(a) A person commits an offense if he:
(1)  makes a bet on the partial or final result of a game or contest or on the performance of a participant in a game or contest;
(2)  makes a bet on the result of any political nomination, appointment, or election or on the degree of success of any nominee, appointee, or candidate; or
(3)  plays and bets for money or other thing of value at any game played with cards, dice, balls, or any other gambling device.
(b)  It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:
(1)  the actor engaged in gambling in a private  place;
(2)  no person received any economic benefit other  than personal winnings; and
(3)  except for the advantage of skill or luck,  the risks of losing and the chances of winning  were the same for all participants.


My, admittedly, limited understanding of the UIGEA is that it "prohibits gambling businesses from knowingly accepting payments in connection with the participation of another person in a bet or wager that involves the use of the Internet and that is unlawful under any federal or state law." I know there are a lot of loopholes here that I'm not addressing (because I don't know what they are and because I'm really tired), but if I'm playing poker in my own home or office (private places) and I'm not receiving anything but my own personal winnings (if any - ha!), and I'm playing against others who, like me, all share the same risk of losing and chance of winning and I can do that live, then I should be able to do that via the internet and the government should butt the hell out.  If they're not going to do that, then they need to get their act together and regulate it properly (and reap the benefits through taxation that will occur).

In reality, there's nothing of legal substance to any of my thoughts here. I'm just ruminating on the hypocrisy of the laws in this country and am mad, and sad, because today's actions have so badly hindered my ability to do something that I love. I can only imagine how the poor guys and gals who make their living via on-line poker (whether as players or as employees in the industry) are feeling. I feel for you.

I agree with some of the bullets Paul Harris has on his blog.  He's right - poker's not dead, but things are going to change.  Since that's the case, why not have a voice in what those changes might be? If there was ever a time for poker to band together in a grassroots fashion, it's now. If the PPA is the voice for the poker player (and if they're not, who/what is??), then they need to come out with a Call to Action and we as players need to support it in word and deed and dollar.

If nothing else, please do this - tweet your representatives and let them know something's got to be done.


Sigh.  Good luck at the tables, peeps.

---------------------------------

Sunday, August 29, 2010

I Love Poker



Yesterday, I got a call from my friend Terry about a Texas Card Players Association game that was to have been held not far away from the house.  Before her call, I hadn't played poker for a week, and that's a long time for me.

Wouldn't you know it, I get all set and ready to go and as I'm driving to the game, Terry calls to say it's been canceled because TABC came in.  I'm not really clear on why they shut the game down.  It was being held at a Hyatt, but I think it had to do with the service of alcohol and the event not being licensed to do so or the fact that the Hyatt served alcohol or something along those lines.  At any rate, lots of people were turned away.

I was bummed, but got back in touch with Terry and my other poker friend, Ann, who had news of another game further down the road (New Braunfels), but at a much greater buy-in ($250 vs $550).  Well, I was in the mood to play so the higher cost didn't deter me. 

Ann and Terry and I are realllllly serious about poker.  We rail each other on-line, play a monthly game (if not more often), serve as each other's sounding boards, and have started meeting weekly (or as often as our schedules allow) to go over the books we're reading and to discuss strategy.  I think it's helped my game a lot.

One thing that Ann's been doing is to take pieces of other players' action as well as giving pieces to select players, and staking or being staked.  Hearing that, I decided to take a stab at getting staked/taking and giving a share of myself, too.  Since Ann and I were both going to play the $550 tourney, I felt good that at least one, if not both, of us would money and we'd at least get our buy-in back.  And that's exactly how it worked out.

I ended up having 2 others with a piece as well and it did affect my game in the sense that I really wanted to do well to show that I'm a good investment.  I was mindful of the fact that I was sitting at the table with 3 other people on my shoulders rooting me on, even if they weren't actually present. I think taking/giving pieces with people whose game you respect is good.  If you don't have to get backers, though, that's even better (because then ALL the money you win is yours, and that's the best).  I'll still be glad to trade pieces with Ann and Terry in the future, because I respect their games, but will take the backing on a tournament by tournament basis from now on.  Will probably revisit that when next year's Main Event rolls around.

Last night's tourney was held at a great hole in the wall bar/restaurant in New Braunfels.  For your buy-in, you got all you could eat of some great, greasy, hole in the wall Texas comfort food, and all you could drink of some great, ice ice cold beer, tea, water, soda, or whatever you wanted.  Just like in any other card room, some beautiful young lady was taking food and drink orders, so you didn't even have to leave the table.  They even brought in a masseuse!

 Twenty-five people signed up to play and only five of us were women. 15,000 in chips and 20 minute blinds, starting at 20/50.  After we drew for seats, 3 of the 5 women (me, Becky and Mary) were seated at the same table and right next to each other (in seats 2, 3, and 4) - crazy. 

Most of the group had played together before and several were people who've had great runs in both on-line and WSOP and WPT tourneys.  Larry and Mark are two players in particular who've made several runs deep in WSOP Main Events and both were at yesterday's final table.  Mark was a bubble boy.  Larry moneyed.  I guess as the buy-in implies, these people play, they're good, and they know poker.

Because they'd never played with me, they couldn't figure me out at all.  After several 4bets (me back at them), though, I finally started getting some respect.  One entailed me showing As (because the guy I 4bet also had As and so of course we were AIPF (I had him covered)).

The other was a standard button raise where I was trying to get short stack (SB) out.  She was AI regardless of my button raise.  I was aiming to get BB to fold (I'll call him bberry b/c he kept checking his Blackberry).  He didn't though.  So, when I cbet the flop (with nothing), he agonized whether to call.  Of course I wanted him to fold but wasn't wild about having to show my hand when/if he did.  But I was taking the pot whether he called or not.  He folded and was aghast to see my K9s.  Turn came a K, though, so he should've been relieved.

Bberry and I had tussled a few hands earlier in what could've been a disaster hand for me.  Still 3 tables and blinds at 150/250 (I think).  The chips were hard to read and when it folded to me, I looked down at AJs in HJ.  I thought I'd put in a standard 3xbb raise, but I'd misread the chips. So instead of a $750 raise, I'd made it $1500 to go.  When the dealer called out my raise, I said "Oh, I meant..." and looked at the chips and then shut up.  CO folded and Bberry looked at me and raised to $3000.  Folds back around to me.

I was pissed.  I'd made a mistake in my bet.  What do I do now?  Something in the way he looked at me and raised made me thinking he'd caught the fact that I'd made a mistake and might fold.  To hell with that, I made it $10,000.  That would've left me with room to work, but a shorter stack.  He agonized and agonized and folded.  Later said he had queens, but...no, I don't believe that.

I picked up good hands when I needed them and picked up blinds with position and well-timed raises also when I needed to.

I only played one hand where luck was involved.  When we got to the final table (10-handed), the blinds were creeping up such that I needed to make a play fairly early on.  After a few orbits, it folded to SB and he raised my BB.  I looked down at T5s.  I thought if I shoved I could get him to fold and I could chip up.  He didn't fold, though.  Instead, he turned over KTo.  Ugh.  Turn brought me a 5 though - wheeeeee!

After that, nobody knew what the hell I was doing.

My nemesis Bberry would not die.  He'd somehow luckboxed his way into the final table but was shortstacked the entire time.  He didn't play a hand until we got 6-handed and both of those hands were premium.  He doubled up with Ks and then 2 hands later he picked up As.  Better to run good late then early, huh?

Payout was to begin once we got down to 4-handed.  When we got to 5-handed, though, we were all relatively even.  Because of the blinds (capped at 10,000/20,000), it had turned into a blind v blind shove/luck fest.  After every orbit a new person had the opportunity to be short stack or big stack and we were no longer playing poker!

 At that point, Larry wisely suggested a 5-way chop with each of us pocketing $2500. Bberry (who'd been milking his shortstack the whole time until he picked up the two premium hands and was suddenly  3d in chips) and Fred (chip leader at that point) both said no, while the rest of us were game.  We tried to explain to them that things would/could change quickly, but they weren't having it.

Fast forward 5 orbits and the blinds have eaten into both of their stacks.  I'm now 2d in chips and Larry is now 1st in chips.  Bberry raises AI on my BB and I had him covered.  Larry folds SB and I look down at 23o.  I count out my chips and start calculating odds.  I start talking to him about my hand and how I don't think I can fold, trying to get information.

He is squirming and looks sick like he's begging me to fold.  I ask him - "you want $2500 or $500?"  He did not hesitate - "Let's chop...mumble, mumble, mumble."  I ask if everyone agrees, we all do and then he says, "Show your hand!  Show your hand!"  I turn over the 23o and he looks at me like he wants to kill me while the whole table erupts in laughter.  But the best was Larry grabbing me for a big hug and whispering to me that I was a "helluva player."  That was better than the money!  Well, almost... =)

Larry made the dealer run the hand and lo and behold, I'd have turned a 3 to bust Bberry's Q9o.  Wheeeee!

Of course Bberry had to come up to me too and tell me how I'd never have called with 23o, how that was the worst hand in poker, how that was stupid and just otherwise criticizing my play.  I asked him if he'd ever run the hand in pokerstove and he looked at me like I was talking a foreign language.

It's ok - he'll get another chance.

And so will I.

With last night's win (after paying stakers) and my PokerStars check (which came in the mail Saturday), my BR now stands at $2100.  Only $7900 to go and I'll have next year's WSOP ME buy-in covered (Dad, if you're reading this, I hope you're already contemplating staking me!!!).

Well, thanks for reading this far and I'd love to hear your comments and/or about your own games!

Until next time, good luck at the tables!

Edit - I forgot to say THANK YOU to everyone who railed me on Twitter.  Thank you!  It was so much more fun having you guys "around"!  
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...